|
Post by cruzerbruiser on Mar 11, 2007 22:25:27 GMT -5
Just cause you lost doesn't mean you can accuse Lawliet of cheating as well.
|
|
|
Post by Megabyte on Mar 11, 2007 22:39:10 GMT -5
I call for a re trail since i was not here to defend plus the judge and jury were not only the same people but they also were not imparcial because lawliet has a slite grudge although he won't admitt it. Lawliet is not compotent as a judge or jury because he not only knows the defendant in real life, but whether he likes it or not feelings are going to get in the way of his final decision. Therefore i demand a new jury and judge, Ones that are totally neutral. My client is innocent because he uses these words in everyday life, He dosen't even usually use them as insults but simply words, Thats how he talks but although he is guilty of saying those words he did not mean them in an offensive way, Therefore should be given A simple warning lvl of 6 and a warning. The defense rests until further notice.
|
|
|
Post by cruzerbruiser on Mar 12, 2007 12:52:34 GMT -5
Your defense doesn't make sense. i use those words in everyday life as well. But I censor them on the forum because IT"S THE RULES! Im sure that all of us cuss, however frequently. But just cause we do that doesn't mean we can pollute the forum with it. And a warnig level of 6? That's nothing. THe punishment doesn't compare to the crime. And if he's guilty of wreaking the havoc on the site over the past weeks, he should punished even more.
|
|
|
Post by Megabyte on Mar 12, 2007 17:11:23 GMT -5
Yes, but all i'm saying is he wasn't thinking when he said those things it's an everyday thing for him he's used to cussing on forums. He usually goes on forums that do not have a rule against swearing therefore i believe he should get a warning of 20% and be un-banned for he was not insulting anyone on purpose. He should be pmed a warning and banned after his second offense.
|
|
|
Post by Lawliet on Mar 12, 2007 20:23:38 GMT -5
Yeah, but he knew the rules beforehand, and even tried to find a loophole through them.
|
|
|
Post by cruzerbruiser on Mar 12, 2007 21:25:43 GMT -5
Lawliet's right. I don't think you can win.
|
|
|
Post by Megabyte on Mar 13, 2007 17:06:43 GMT -5
And how do you know he read the rules?
|
|
|
Post by Lawliet on Mar 13, 2007 17:15:07 GMT -5
Cheating the censor, when have I done taht, and about the profanity The rules only say constant profanity, I used a few times, and I think Megabyte should be lawyer. It's actually a bundle of sticks B. Both positive and negative comments are welcome. Negative comments should be made in a constructive manner. He knows the rules now, and he knew the rules then.
|
|
|
Post by Megabyte on Mar 13, 2007 17:22:17 GMT -5
Well i don't think you should've gone so hard on him, but still the crazy stuff HAS stopped since he left, you know like the hacking and what not, so this may confirm our suspicions!!!
|
|
|
Post by Lawliet on Mar 14, 2007 6:53:50 GMT -5
Well i don't think you should've gone so hard on him, but still the crazy stuff HAS stopped since he left, you know like the hacking and what not, so this may confirm our suspicions!!! Scence when have we been specifically targeting him for all the things that have ben happening?
|
|
|
Post by Megabyte on Mar 15, 2007 17:06:42 GMT -5
Me and cruzier suspected him.
|
|
|
Post by cruzerbruiser on Mar 15, 2007 17:39:38 GMT -5
But I didn't specifically target him.
|
|
|
Post by Lawliet on Mar 15, 2007 19:31:36 GMT -5
Megabyte didn't target, he shot blindly.
|
|
|
Post by Megabyte on Mar 17, 2007 22:22:21 GMT -5
No lawliet if you haven't seen the pms then you can't really comment on that in the first place!
|
|
|
Post by Lawliet on Mar 18, 2007 10:00:06 GMT -5
Believe me Megabyte, I know you.
|
|